Page 1 of 1

DenDen's weird policy on NO Beckham Kids pix

PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:07 pm
by Mr Giggles
DenDen is a spice girl forum which I drop into from time to time, they seem to have this weird rule that no images of the Beckham children are allowed to be posted. The owners claim they have agreed with the Beckham lawyers not to allow them.

Now this doesn't apply to the other spice girl children whose images are posted with any problem.

I think that if they don't allow images of the Beckham kids then all images of kids should be not allowed.

Am I right or what?

DenDen's weird policy on NO Beckham Kids pix

PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:15 pm
by cazkins
I suppose it's up to the lawyers of the other Spice Girls to get the same agreement in place. The Beckhams are obviously more on the ball than the others. On the other hand, I don't remember any death threats being made against the others so maybe they' don't have as much reason to be security conscious? I guess it's another matter that all boils down to the choices of the individual.

DenDen's weird policy on NO Beckham Kids pix

PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:30 pm
by cazkins
Ms Honey wrote:
I'm actually of the opinion that pictures of the young children of celebs shouldn't be printed/posted. The children themselves are entitled to their privacy regardless of what their parents do or whether they parents choose to parade them for attention. I really have no respect for celebs that do that.



I agree with you. I don't even understand why some people are so desperate to see pictures of celeb's kids. I'd rather look at pictures of my own kids and grandchildren.

DenDen's weird policy on NO Beckham Kids pix

PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:17 pm
by No Chance
Moved to Celebs. :)

DenDen's weird policy on NO Beckham Kids pix

PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 11:27 pm
by Mr Giggles
I don't mind celebs with their kids, it would worry me if celebs were NOT pictured with their kids.

I will say that some celebs to use their kids as a PR tool.